Back then, the capital punishment was almost always accompanied by torture, and executions were public. Moreover, the most employed execution method was by beheading and hanging. Nowadays, death penalty is used for people who commit what is called capital crimes or capital offenses. These consist in first degree murder, acts of terrorism, espionage, drug trafficking, religious crimes and acts against national security. In some muslin countries, offenses like adultery, blasphemy, sorcery and rape are also considered capital crimes and are being punished by execution.
Persons who were under 18 when committing the capital offense are exempted from death penalty. This seems to be completely illogical and contradictory. How can anyone possibly justify carrying out an action that is unanimously agreed upon being wrong? The answer is no one; therefore the death penalty does not morally seem permissible. From a moral standpoint, the types of people that receive the death penalty are usually not physically or mentally fit to receive the punishment.
One such group that has suffered from their mental disabilities are the mentally retarded. One of the reasons behind this high percentage is linked to the idea that people that are mentally retarded have a high desire to please figures of authority.
Taking that into consideration, it seems that one cannot in good judgment state that individuals that are in this group can reasonably be able to receive the death penalty considering their mental states.
One of the other most controversial aspects of the death penalty comes in the form of flawed executions. However, for each method that has been used as a means to attempt to execute criminals, there have been flawed attempts that have caused severe pain and suffering for those that have had to endure the process. The electric chair has reported several instances where multiple attempts were made to execute a criminal before the act was actually carried out such as with the execution of John Louis Evans III Haines.
Even the more modern means of execution have their flawed attempts such as with lethal injection. The execution of Stephen McCoy in May of is a prime example of this. According to witnesses, McCoy reacted violently to the drugs administered to him and was seen gagging, violently coughing, and undergoing body contortions Haines.
Examples like this show that the systems that we have in place have serious flaws in them. From a moral standpoint, one cannot willing and with a clear conscious sentence an individual to an execution that may be cruel and unusual as that violates the Bill of Rights, which the judicial branch is charged with ensuring is never violated.
A second argument that is given against the use of the death penalty is that it does not actually deter anyone from committing the crimes that result in receiving the punishment. The basic argument that is made by individuals that support this form of punishment is that it makes an example out of those that commit these types of crimes and, therefore, will strike fear into the hearts of those that are thinking about attempting to commit the same sort of crime resulting in them rethinking their actions.
Unfortunately, this rational is taken with flawed logic. Those that receive the death penalty have usually committed the most gruesome, violent sorts of crimes that usually include one or more murders. Further, those that commit these sorts of crimes are usually mentally unstable.
These are the types of individuals that have no regard for the safety of themselves or that of others, and will act out their plans of actions regardless of what has happened in the past or present. The hope of deterring these sorts of individuals by making an example out of a criminal will not really make a difference in their final actions.
Empirically, one of the major rationales behind allowing the death penalty to remain is that the punishment will deter others from wanting to commit a crime.
Though ruling from a standpoint of fear is already morally questionable, the question remains: It would appear that it does not hold. Further, of the inmates that were on death row, only 65 of them were executed that year. This staggering discrepancy of condemned to execution ratio can appear anything but frightening to the individual.
The analysis that these two present appears to have a definite rational component to it, and the evidence suggests that the death penalty is not a deterrent to commit this type of crime. In another sample essay on the death penalty , we wrote that the death penalty was a modern tragedy because the deterrence argument does not hold up. Another argument against the use of the death penalty is the high cost that this process has on the taxpayers. One would imagine that a life sentence in prison would be the most expensive punishment that an individual can receive, however the cost of execution is very expensive.
A recent study that was released by the Urban Institute found that the cost of the death penalty is alarmingly high. Further, the study found that the use of the death penalty has taken a great amount of financial resources from the taxpayers over the course of two decades in the sate of Maryland.
In order to determine whether the death penalty is to be considered cruel and unusual punishment, it is necessary to first define The state murdering people because of their crimes simply does not equate to justice. It is real easy to hear about how the govern Electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, firing squad, hanging, guillotine, and garroting.
When you hear these words what do The most severe of all sentences: Also known as the death penalty, capital punishment I am all for Capital Punishment. I think that if you kill someone you should be given the death penalty.
I think that the death of There are five basic reasons that society uses when imposing "punishment" that I've been able to conclude from my readings.
Need A College Level Paper? Capital Punishment Find more results for this search now! Please enter a keyword or topic phrase to perform a search. Corporal punishment is not a valid method of punishment Corporal punishment is not a valid method of punishment Most parents have generally strived to find many ways to cope with thei Crime and Punishment In our society's criminal justice system, justice equals punishment.
Capital Punishment There has been much controversy over capital punishment over the years. Death Penalty - Persuasive Essay When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, one is bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homi
Free capital punishment papers, essays, and research papers.
Free Term Papers on Capital Punishment available at considerableaps.tk, the largest free term paper community.
Jul 08, · Free Essays from Bartleby | Furman had four main arguments: most western nations had abolished capital punishment because it was an unsuccessful way to deter. Free Death Penalty papers, essays, and research papers.
This sample essay on the death penalty gives a series of strong arguments against the continued use of capital punishment: flawed executions and wasted funds are cited/5(16). An argumentative essay about death penalty. The death penalty is the ultimate punishment. There is no harsher punishment than death itself.