Does a big breakthrough in the research justify the use of the method in the present? Would the benefits of studying abortions outweigh the costs? The choice was subjective: Nobody knows all the risks or all the possible outcomes, so we had to value it with our perception of the outcome. Perception is influenced by our individual feelings, morals and knowledge about the issue.
Second, at the time we did not know whether the research was necessary and sufficient to give us the mentioned health benefits. Third, other consequences of the research are uncertain. Could the research be misused in the future or not?
We simply do not know. All knowledge acquired, within research or other arenas, may be used for evil causes in the future - it is impossible to know. The Stem cell research-debate is an example on how people value various aspects differently. It is also an example of how critics and debate can lead to significant improvements for both sides.
Check out our quiz-page with tests about:. Retrieved Sep 14, from Explorable. The text in this article is licensed under the Creative Commons-License Attribution 4. You can use it freely with some kind of link , and we're also okay with people reprinting in publications like books, blogs, newsletters, course-material, papers, wikipedia and presentations with clear attribution.
Don't have time for it all now? No problem, save it as a course and come back to it later. Share this page on your website: Pros And Cons in Research The debate of the pros and cons of stem cell research clearly illustrate the difficult ethics evaluations researchers sometimes must do.
This article is a part of the guide: Select from one of the other courses available: Don't miss these related articles:. Aborted fetuses are not the only source of stem cells There are stem cells in the both placenta and blood contained in the placenta.
Also the primary source of stem cells is from blastocysts. Instead of simply wasting them, scientists can use them to further the possibilities of stem cell research. Although it seems that stem cell research is a useful way to use the excess embryos, some say that the embryos are not always wasted.
Some of the embryos that are frozen wait to be adopted by other couples. This is an alternative to being destroyed Reaves. This seems as though it should be the fate of all excess embryos; but again, during the transition from being frozen to thawing, there is a risk of death.
Ethical issues that arise from stem cell research are solely based on where the stem cells are taken from. This is a reasonable argument supported by the fact the cells are taken from a living embryo, which is destroyed, after the cells are taken. In the early stages of stem cell research, all of the samples are taken from excess embryos that are stored at in vitro clinics. This can only be done if the doners give the scientist permission to study the embryos.
This is what causes an uproar in the pro-life community. The community believes that all the embryos still have the potential to live.
To solve the problem, the pro-life groups exclaim that there are more "ethical" ways to obtain the cells. One way to obtain cells is by pulling the stem cells from aborted fetuses. Another way is to obtain the cells is from healthy adults. This is an alternative to using embryonic stem cells. The stems that are pulled from the adults do not show the same promising effects as the ones pulled from the embryos. The main focus of this controversy should not be where and how they are obtained because both sides are trying new ways to obtain the cells.
The main focus is that scientists are trying to preserve life. The supporting groups are trying. When this process is a success that particular embryo is inserted into the female and the rest of the embryos that are fertilized are discarded.
Scientists use these useless embryos in the blastocyst stage for their stem cell extraction. The actual study of stem cells has only been experimented on since Stem Cell research did not become well-known until federal funding was issued to the study.
Before this, only private practices performed research, so the public could not benefit as efficiently. Funding is one of the biggest obstacles for stem cell research. On August 9, , President Bush addressed whether the federal government should fund stem cell research.
Bush was aware that it could have many benefits but he was worried about the moral issue. Because of this controversy, he decided to limit federal funding to only the cell lines that were derived before his speech. Leading universities such as Harvard and Stanford established privately funded institutes to get around these restrictions. Federal funding is essential to the development of embryonic stem cell research because money would not be an issue and the better scientists would be more willing to help with the project.
The outcome of stem cell research, while hardly an endorsement of cloning—despite the imaginative efforts of some ethicists, in the name of unlimited procreative rights, to show benefits for certain parents in procreating cloned babies— helped cool the opposition.
Geron, The research imperative is best fed by public support, but it has shown itself capable of surviving well enough if the opposition can be quieted and the prospects of health gains constantly underscored. It is often forgotten, moreover, that controversial biomedical research in the United States always has an available ace in the hole: That is not something the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries care to advertise, but there is nothing to stop them.
If the possibility of human cloning caught the public imagination, the prospect of stem cell research had generated comparable scientific interest in The term stem cells ordinarily refer to cells in the human body that renew tissues, but of greatest interest are those found in an early-stage embryo. Embryonic stem ES cells have the capacity to develop into almost any cell type, while embryonic germ EG cells, with properties similar to ES cells, come from the primordial reproductive cells of the developing fetus.
Though ES cells are pluripotent, able to develop into all the cells and tissues of the human body, they are not totipotent, because they could not develop into full individuals.
The morally hazardous form of the research imperative responds differently. The proposed research is called morally obligatory, and it is either said or implied that the chosen research direction is the only or the incontestably superior way to go; its proponents dismiss critics of the research as ignorant, fearful, or biased and make only superficial changes to mollify them; and when the research fails to pan out or is slow in coming, they take that fact to show that more research money is needed or that ethical hand-wringing and groundless anxieties have stood in its way.
Strikingly, for all the hostility it generated, research on violence in particular and on behavioral genetics more generally has not relied on the moral imperative language even though its supporters believe it can be of great value.
At the same time, the researchers have been sensitive to the main line of criticism, that the research results can be misused, and they have been quick to object to media distortions or the excess enthusiasm of some of their colleagues.
The implications of that sentence are that no other line of research can be fruitful, and that there is no abuse in destroying embryos. Gilbert, But the former claim is excessive, and the latter at the very least contestable. That same report did say that, in a broad way, the potential benefits of research are not necessarily sufficient to morally justify it, and that limits on science are sometimes necessary. Overall, the issue of Human Embryonic Stem Cell research is a much debated subject that needs our immediate attention.
It is looked at from scientific, political, and religious perspectives. Every person has their own set of beliefs and will always have their own opinion. Stem cell research is a fascinating subject that can completely change our world. It is a question of our ethical beliefs and scientific curiosity.
French, This is the brave new world that we live in today. Stem cell research is a scientific, political, and religious issue.
It is a question of morality and ethical beliefs. It has endless possibilities and can be very beneficial for medicinal purposes. There is no definite right or wrong for this subject, except a personal judgment. This research could also yield other benefits such as an understanding of miscarriages and improved in vitro fertilization. Whenever there are benefits there are also consequences.
Stem cell research may be controversial to some people and others may view it as unethical, but the benefits of stem cell research are clear. Even if stem cells can only do half of what scientists are theorizing, the benefits of .
Stem Cell Research: The Benefits of Stem Cells Essay Words | 3 Pages. extracted the adult stem cells from it and formed an osteoblast, which is a bone forming cell. Six months after the osteoblast was injected, it started forming new bone material which filled the gaps (NIH Stem Cells).
The benefits and problems associated with stem cell use and stem cell research. Problems Benefits There is a lot of controversy about laws and beliefs in respect to stem cells, specifically embryonic stem cells, regarding contraception, abortion, and in . Do the benefits of using embryonic stem cells for medical and research purposes outweigh the disadvantages associated with loss of life? Problem: Embryonic stem cells result in loss of life Embryonic stem cells are unspecialised cells that have the ability under certain conditions to create any of the different types of tissue in early human .
Stem Cell Research Benefits Essay Sample. Stem Cell research has continual possible advancements in assisting society in medical care. It allows for better understanding and perhaps relief of diseases and disorders existing in humans today. Potential benefits of stem cell research are numerous and range from development and testing of new drugs to cell-based therapies in which stem cells are used to replace ailing or destroyed tissue or cells.