These terms were reflected in the information architecture, visual design, front-end code, and the backend systems that translate the edited code into email-compliant HTML. This language was essential to the project, and resulted from comparative research we conducted in the first weeks of our work. Instead of replicating the structure of the first product we came across, we weighed the pros and cons of various implementations to suss out an appropriate approach that balanced usability and feature-richness.
Comparative research can inform projects at early stages, providing fodder and direction for initial design concepts, and in the midst of design iterations when refining content, interaction, and general architectural patterns.
Some things to consider:. Comparative analyses can save time. See what the most successful products are doing and try to figure out how they do it. Focus on primary, complex workflows. Study the work of obvious competitors, but also look outside of the immediate industry. Be inventive and broad-ranging as you collect examples in order to avoid provincial biases and assumptions that may be inherent to industry products.
When documenting instances, consider using animated gifs to show interactivity to teammates and clients. For the email product redesign, we started weekly user testing before we had a functioning prototype. This gave us a sense for where people succeed — and where they get tripped up — when using industry-leading software. Practice the habit of criticism. Design criticism ought to be something we do constantly and casually, reflecting on the products we interact with daily. Not that you would.
This article is a reflection on work done mostly by the astute and esteemed Curt Arledge. Nobody likes popups, so we waited until now to recommend our newsletter, a curated periodical featuring thoughts, opinions, and tools for building a better digital world. Comparative research can take many forms. Two key factors are space and time. Spatially, cross-national comparisons are by far the most common, although comparisons within countries, contrasting different areas, cultures or governments also subsist and are very constructive, especially in a country like New Zealand, where policy often changes depending on which race it pertains to.
The historical comparative research involves comparing different time-frames. The two main choices within this model are comparing two stages in time either snapshots or time-series , or just comparing the same thing over time, to see if a policy's effects differ over a stretch of time.
When it comes to subject matter of comparative inquiries, many contend there is none unique to it. This may indeed be true, but a brief perusal of comparative endeavours reveals there are some topics more recurrent than others. Determining whether socioeconomic or political factors are more important in explaining government action is a familiar theme. In general, however, the only thing that is certain in comparative research issues is the existence of differences to be analysed. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Retrieved from " https: Social science methodology Comparisons. Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 21 February , at It can be seen as a way of bridging the qualitative and quantitative research traditions. I will in this article focus on comparative survey research.
There are many names for the type of research that we do: Social scientists should undertake not to interpret survey data relating to a country about which they know little or nothing. This would tend to ensure cross-national collaboration in the interpretation as well as the design of comparative research. Resist the temptation to compare too many countries at once. Emerging naturally from the six previous rules, cross-national surveys should ideally be confined to the smallest number of countries consistent with their aims, rather than celebrating as many nations as possible in their purview.
Cross-national surveys should pay as much attention to the choice and compilation of aggregate-level contextual variables, as they do to individual-level dependent and independent variables relevant level-2 variables.
Social scientists contemplating or engaged in cross-national studies should be as open about their limitations as they are enthusiastic about their explanatory powers.
Comparative research is a research methodology in the social sciences that aims to make comparisons across different countries or cultures. A major problem in comparative research is that the data sets in different countries may not use the same categories, or define categories differently (for example by using different definitions of poverty).
Comparative research is a research methodology in the social sciences that aims to make comparisons across different countries or cultures. The term comparative method refers to a specific kind of comparison – the comparison of large macro-social units.
The major aim of comparative research is to identify similarities and differences between social entities. Comparative research seeks to compare and contrast nations, cultures, societies, and institutions. Key points. Comparative research methods have long been used in cross-cultural studies to identify, analyse and explain similarities and differences across societies.
Comparative research is a research methodology in the social sciences that aims to make comparisons across different countries or cultures. A major problem in comparative research is that the data sets in different countries may not use the same categories, or define categories differently. Comparative research is a research methodology in the social sciences that aims to make comparisons across different countries or cultures. A major problem in comparative research is that the data sets in different countries may not use the same categories.